Home
Editorial
Advertising
Subscribe
Contact Us
Archives
Site map
Privacy Policy
Copyright 2010 by Neubauer & Associates, Inc
November
2011 Issue

FEATURES:


The Supreme Court puts plaintiffs through the Hamilton Meats grinder
The Howell v. Hamilton Meats decision limits medical damages to amounts actually paid by health insurers – if indeed the bills were paid under a health insurance policy – and it leaves many questions unanswered. Gary Simms argued the case before the California Supreme Court.
Gary L. Simms


Products liability: The Big Four defense strategies
The defense will likely blame the state of the technology, the plaintiff, his employer or a component manufacturer.
Larry Booth


Lights and cameras; Tweets and Google
With TV cameras in the courtroom, cutting off jurors from seeking answers on Google and commenting via social media is proving more difficult.
Anayat Durrani


Employment: When customer lists are not trade secrets
Making the case of whether a former employee has unlawfully solicited former customers.
Barbara A. Lawless

and Tanisha Shafer


When your law partnership isn’t working
Resolving partnership issues through executive coaching and mediation rather than litigation.
Deana Kardel


Profile: Barbara and Therese Lawless
Daughters of a law school dean, this sister act brings a passion for trial work to employment law.
Stephen Ellison


DEPARTMENTS:

Trial Practice and Procedure
A question of too many experts
In highly technical cases like products liability, issues often arise about multiple experts in overlapping areas of expertise.
Eustace de Saint Phalle


Settlement Matters
Mediation in the woodshed
Navigating the jurisdictional dilemma.
Jeffrey Krivis


Appellate Reports and Cases in Brief
Recent cases of interest to members of the plaintiffs’ bar.
Jeffrey Isaac Ehrlich


Back Story
The pincer move
With more than one defendant at trial, the enemy of your enemy might be your friend.
Miles B. Cooper

 


powered by FreeFind